Brass vs Bronze vs Copper: Which Metal for Your Machined Parts?
All three are copper alloys — but they machine differently, conduct differently, and survive different environments. Composition, machinability ratings, strength, corrosion, and cost, compared for real machined parts.

IsoCNC Engineering Team
CNC Machining & DFM Engineers · Updated · 10 min read

On this page
Same Family, Three Different Metals
Brass, bronze, and copper sit next to each other on every material rack, and buyers mix up the names constantly. The difference between brass and bronze comes down to the alloying element. Brass is copper plus zinc — the free-machining C360 grade runs about 61.5% copper, 35.5% zinc, and 3% lead. Bronze is copper plus tin in its classic form, though the engineering family has widened: aluminum bronze (copper-aluminum) and phosphor bronze (copper-tin-phosphorus) are bronzes too. Copper itself, in grades like C110 ETP, is 99.90% pure metal.
That one difference in chemistry cascades into everything a buyer cares about: how fast the part machines, whether it survives seawater, how much current it carries, and what the raw bar costs. There is no universal "best" — but for any given part, there is usually a clear right answer.
Brass vs Bronze vs Copper at a Glance
Using the grades shops actually cut — C360 free-cutting brass, C932 and C954 bronzes, and C110 ETP copper:
| Property | Brass (C360) | Bronze (C932 / C954) | Copper (C110) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Composition | Cu + zinc, ~3% lead | Cu + tin (or aluminum) | 99.90% pure copper |
| Machinability rating | 100 (the baseline) | ~70 (C932) / ~60 (C954) | 20 — soft, gummy |
| Electrical conductivity | ~26% IACS | Lower than copper, varies by alloy | ~101% IACS |
| Tensile strength | 303–372 MPa | 207–241 MPa (C932) / 515–620 MPa (C954) | 220–310 MPa |
| Corrosion behavior | Good in air; dezincification risk in aggressive water | Excellent, preferred for marine service | Good; forms a protective patina |
| Typical machined uses | Fittings, connectors, threaded parts, high-volume turning | Bearings, bushings, wear plates, marine hardware | Busbars, heat sinks, electrodes, electrical parts |
| Relative material cost | Lowest of the three | Mid to high, alloy-dependent | Usually the most expensive |
Machinability: Brass Sets the Baseline
Copper alloys are ranked on a machinability scale where C360 free-cutting brass = 100. Its ~3% lead content acts as a built-in chip breaker: chips come off short and clean, tools last, and cycle times drop. That is why C360 dominates high-volume turned fittings, connectors, and threaded components — when the drawing just says "brass," this is usually the grade. For shop-ready grade picks and cutting parameters, see our guide to machining brass.

The bronzes machine well but slower: C932 bearing bronze rates around 70 and C954 aluminum bronze around 60. Respectable numbers — no shop fears bronze — but you pay for the alloy’s extra capability in cycle time. Pure C110 copper rates just 20. It is soft and gummy, produces long stringy chips, and work-hardens at the cut. Copper parts are absolutely machinable — sharp tools, high rake angles, disciplined feeds — but expect longer cycle times and more burr control work. Never specify pure copper when brass would do; you pay more for the material and more for the machining.
| Grade | Family | Why machinists know it | Typical parts |
|---|---|---|---|
| C36000 | Free-cutting brass | Machinability rating 100 — the industry baseline; chips break clean | Fittings, valves, connectors, inserts |
| C93200 (SAE 660) | Bearing bronze | Machinability ~70; the default bushing and bearing stock | Bushings, bearings, thrust washers |
| C95400 | Aluminum bronze | Machinability ~60; 515–620 MPa tensile with seawater resistance | Wear plates, pump and valve parts, propellers |
| C11000 (ETP) | Pure copper | Machinability 20 — chosen for conductivity, not machinability | Busbars, heat sinks, EDM electrodes |
Conductivity: Why Anyone Picks Copper
Pure copper’s reason to exist in a machine shop is conduction. C110 ETP copper carries about 101% IACS electrical conductivity and roughly 390 W/m·K thermally — busbars, heat sinks, and EDM electrodes live here. Brass, by contrast, conducts about 26% IACS, and the tin and aluminum bronzes sit lower still. The gap is not marginal: copper conducts roughly four times better than brass. If the part carries current or moves heat, the choice is copper and the machining pain is simply the price. If it does not, paying for copper’s conductivity is waste.
Strength and Wear: Bronze’s Home Turf
For load-bearing and wear duty, the ranking flips. C954 aluminum bronze is the strongest common grade here at 515–620 MPa tensile — nearly double C360 brass (303–372 MPa) and well beyond C110 copper (220–310 MPa by temper). C932 bearing bronze is softer (207–241 MPa) by design: as a bearing material it embeds contaminants and runs against steel shafts without galling, which is why it remains the default bushing and thrust-washer stock a century after SAE 660 was standardized. Brass sits in the middle — stronger than pure copper, no bearing credentials. Gears, wear plates, pump sleeves, valve bodies, and heavy bushings are bronze parts; drawing callouts that say "brass" for these are worth a second look.
Corrosion: The Saltwater Question
All three resist ordinary atmospheric corrosion well — that is the family trait. The differences show up in water. Brass’s zinc is its weak point: in chloride-containing, warm, stagnant, or acidic water, brass can suffer dezincification — zinc selectively leaches out, leaving a porous copper-rich skeleton that looks intact but has lost its strength. Fittings that weep or crumble after years in aggressive water are the classic symptom. None of them rust in the iron-oxide sense; what actually happens to copper over time is covered in does copper rust.
Bronze is the marine answer. Aluminum bronzes like C954 are specified for seawater bearings, pump and valve components, propellers, and marine fasteners precisely because they hold up where brass quietly degrades. Pure copper handles many waters well and develops its familiar protective patina, but for load-bearing marine hardware, bronze is the default engineering choice. Rule of thumb: dry or freshwater service — any of the three; saltwater — bronze.
Cost: Material and Machining Both Count
On raw material, brass is generally the cheapest of the three, bronze sits in the middle to upper range depending on alloy content, and pure copper is usually the most expensive per kilogram. But material price is only half the quote. Machinability multiplies through every part: a C360 brass fitting that runs at rating 100 costs far less to make than the same geometry in C110 copper at rating 20 — longer cycles, more tool wear, more deburring. On high-volume turned parts, the machining difference often dwarfs the material difference. The cheapest part is usually brass where brass works; the most expensive mistake is specifying copper or aluminum bronze where the application never uses what the alloy offers.
How to Choose for Your Part
Fittings, connectors, threaded inserts, high-volume turned parts: C360 brass. Fastest to machine, lowest material cost, good corrosion resistance in normal service. The default until proven otherwise.
Busbars, heat sinks, electrodes, current-carrying parts: C110 copper. You are buying 101% IACS — accept the machining cost because nothing else in the family comes close on conductivity.
Bushings, bearings, thrust washers: C932 (SAE 660) bearing bronze. Purpose-built for running against steel shafts.
Marine hardware, propellers, pump and valve parts in seawater, heavy wear plates: C954 aluminum bronze. Strength plus saltwater resistance.
One more check: C360’s 3% lead improves machinability but trips lead-restriction rules in regulated applications — potable water, some RoHS-adjacent programs. If lead content is constrained, ask about lead-free brass alternatives before the quote, not after.
Material pages with grade-by-grade detail: brass CNC machining, and the wider selection logic in our CNC machining materials guide. For the stainless side of the same decision, see 304 vs 316 stainless steel.
Related: Machining copper specifically? Our machining copper guide covers C110 vs C145 grades, built-up edge, and the tooling that beats gummy chips.
FAQ
Is brass or bronze easier to machine?
Brass, by a wide margin. Free-cutting C360 brass is the machinability reference standard for copper alloys — rating 100 — with lead content that breaks chips cleanly and lets tools run fast. Common bronzes machine well but slower (C932 around 70, C954 around 60 on the same scale). If the part does not need bronze’s bearing or marine properties, brass is the cheaper and faster choice.
Which is stronger — brass, bronze, or copper?
It depends on the grade. Aluminum bronze C954 is the strongest of the common machining grades at 515–620 MPa tensile. C360 brass runs 303–372 MPa, C110 copper 220–310 MPa depending on temper, and C932 bearing bronze 207–241 MPa. Pure copper is chosen for conductivity, not strength.
Is brass or bronze better for saltwater?
Bronze. Brass contains zinc, and in chloride-containing or stagnant water it can suffer dezincification — zinc leaches out and leaves a porous, weakened copper-rich structure. Bronzes, especially aluminum bronzes like C954, resist seawater far better, which is why marine hardware, propellers, and pump components are bronze. For marine parts, do not substitute brass to save cost.
Why is copper harder to machine than brass?
Pure copper is soft and gummy: it produces long, stringy chips, tends to work-harden at the cut, and has a machinability rating of only 20 versus brass at 100. It machines fine with sharp tools, high rake angles, and disciplined feeds — but cycle times are longer and burr control is harder. Specify copper only when its conductivity (~101% IACS) is actually needed.
Is bronze just a type of brass?
No. Both are copper alloys, but brass is copper plus zinc, while bronze is copper plus tin — or, in modern engineering bronzes, copper plus aluminum (aluminum bronze) or tin with phosphorus (phosphor bronze). The alloying element drives completely different behavior: zinc gives brass its machinability, while tin and aluminum give bronze its bearing properties and corrosion resistance.
Comparing these alloys for a real part? The CNC machining materials
Related Resources

304 vs 316 Stainless Steel: Which Grade for Machined Parts?
304 vs 316 stainless steel compared for CNC machined parts: composition, corrosion resistance (PREN), machinability,…

6061 vs 5052 Aluminum: Which Alloy for Your Parts?
6061 vs 5052 aluminum compared: strength, machinability, bending, welding, corrosion, anodizing, and 2026 prices —…

6061 vs 6063 Aluminum: Machining vs Extrusion
6061 vs 6063 aluminum compared: strength, machinability, extrudability, anodizing, and selection rules — why…

How to Outsource CNC Machining to China, Step by Step
How to outsource CNC machining to China, step by step: vet suppliers, compare landed cost, control quality remotely,…
Sources
Standards and references behind the numbers on this page.
- Copper Development Association, Alloy C36000 (Free-Cutting Brass) — the official 100 machinability rating every other alloy is measured against
- Brass — Wikipedia — the copper-zinc alloy family and lead’s role in chip breaking
- Bronze — Wikipedia — bronze alloy families — tin, aluminum, and phosphor bronzes
Brass, Bronze, or Copper — Machined In-House
IsoCNC machines all three alloy families daily, from C360 turned fittings to C954 wear plates. Send the drawing — an engineer reviews every RFQ, typically within 1–2 business days.